Hothouse’s PRIMAL INSTINCT confronts the theme of pure intention through a trans-disciplinary lens — an approach not born of method, but of necessity, shaped by the velocity and violence of the now. This is not an exercise in critique, but in compression — where understanding moves beyond the analytical and becomes a reckoning: emotional, pressurised, and yet strangely clarifying. The photosynthescript that is ‘Nature’ is no longer a neutral backdrop, but a fractured archive of possibility. We subvert the idea of (one-)nature not with answers, but with gestures to gradually replace it with a multiplicity of models grafted and woven in its cracks. This is not an appeal to idealism, but a recognition of what already is: tangled, emergent, and forever forking paths. These cracks are not simply structural flaws, but generative spaces: signs of strain in the imposed coherence of a singular worldview. They are the places where tension accumulates, where the fiction of unity shows it can split, where suppressed knowledges, alternative ecologies, and hybrid ontologies find room to surface. Cracks become not a symbol of failure, but a site of possibility, as they speak other languages, they are not direct interruptions of the master’s discourse, they are points of diffraction, sort of movable topologies difficult to represent. We are interested in finding those moments of intensification, to have a peek at what hides beyond, running parallel to, subjected to, yet countering, the bluntness of a pure intention. We are lured towards that that ultimately gets things in motion: the latent drives, the sub-versions kicking, the PRIMAL INSTINCT and informal strategies of re-production, myths of re-definition, possibly minor acts/sites, indexes showing the possibility of radical inventions and activations, art speaking through primal screams, pointing to or gesturing towards a certain ontological rebelling. Cracks and folds are to be discovered for marking the entry points, or the curvatures for unruly growth. They are meta-static fissures, allowing a polyphony of perspectives to take root and sprawl — for a subtle yet radical rewilding of thought.

PRIMAL INSTINCT, our curatorial framework, is thus a manifesto to analyse and question the monolithic, orderly and tamed definition of “nature” (the model of nature) embraced through leaps of “pure intention” — the moves foundational to the nation-state's vision of becoming a planetary reference point: a Garden City. The (one-)nature of the designed garden brutally strips (other-)nature(s) of its potential openness, of the virtual possibility of true unpredictability, and of course, of the sublime and uncanny beauty of the inform, the deformed, the transformed. We looked and searched for instincts, to select ultimately a few, to subvert and reimagine this (one-)nature, to activate (an-other-)natures, promoting definitions that defy ideological containment. Three instinctual responses were therefore selected to be part of our curatorial framework, three very different yet possibly converging models of nature: Field Notes & the Ecology of Chance [Tini Aliman], TOTAL-PLEASURE-SUITE [Elizabeth Gabrielle Lee] and Square Forest [Salad Dressing].

3301 chars

6 posts

View by

Tini Aliman

Field Notes & the Ecology of Chance (2025)

Stainless steel, aluminium & soil

96 chars

Field Notes & the Ecology of Chance unfolds at the confluence of acoustic ecology, environmental history, and decolonial sound practice. Informed by Singapore’s botanical colonial legacy and rapid urban transformation, the installation uses field recording, archival research, and spatial sound to uncover what is  termed “colonial acoustemologies”— sonic knowledge systems rooted in imperial control. This practice reframes listening as a mode of resistance and relationality, transforming technologies of capture into instruments of re-sounding, return, and ecological speculation. The installation functions as a speculative instrument of listening, proposing a mode of sonic engagement that resists colonial taxonomies and reclaims sound as a relational, embodied method, an infrastructure for catalysing care and memory.

858 chars

Elizabeth Gabrielle Lee

TOTAL-PLEASURE-SUITE (2025)

School tables, tape, carabiners, cable ties, rubber tyres and diamanté strings

137 chars

TOTAL-PLEASURE-SUITE reimagines how desire operates within engineered environments shaped by safety, control, and knowability. It challenges the rhetoric of nature as pure and determined by the divine, instead proposing a feral transformation that emerges from entangled ecosystems and material excess. It explores the tension between nostalgia and novelty, between green-washed restoration and techno-futurism, advocating for forgotten pleasures that lie outside dominant narratives of progress. 

Everyday objects are transmuted into tools of expression and rebellion, idols, signs of immanent pleasure that get animated by non-normative gestures to confront how desire is managed, repressed, or redirected in public space. It questions whether instincts are pure, or if they are enmeshed in a diffuse, messy, underground, one shaped by sensory and material excess, what the artist calls the “tropical gothic” — a space where flesh, long disciplined by invisible catechisms or any form of realism, reclaims its right to excess, interrupting the dominant systems of order.

1096 chars

Salad Dressing

Square Forest (2025)

90 native plant species of Singapore

72 chars

Square Forest is an inquiry into the ethics of rewilding, displacement, and spiritual ecology within the Anthropocene. Responding to the paradox of the “City in Nature” initiative — where native biodiversity is restored through the importation of wilderness — the work interrogates the logics of control and domestication underpinning ecological restoration. Drawing from posthuman and decolonial thought, Square Forest treats soil as an archive of more-than-human memory and plants as sessile refugees, vulnerable yet resilient. It asks: can an imported forest ever truly take root, spiritually or ecologically, in a land remade by capital? And if plants had a voice, what would they say of exile, adaptation, and longing? In invoking the “sessile instinct,” the work gestures toward a vegetal mode of being — rooted, receptive, and relational — that resists mastery and reclaims belonging through ritual, care, and speculative kinship.

985 chars
PRIMAL INSTINCT
Hide